|
Luther | 
 enlarge | Director: Eric Till
Actors: Joseph Fiennes, Bruno Ganz, Peter Ustinov, Alfred Molina, Jonathan Firth
Studio: MGM (Video & DVD)
List Price: $14.98
Buy New: $9.99
You Save: $4.99 (33%)
New (45) Used (23) Collectible (2) from $6.17
Rating:  216 reviews
Format: Ac-3, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, Dvd-video, Subtitled, Widescreen, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), Latin (Original Language), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled)
Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 123
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.3 x 4.9 x 0.6
MPN: MGMD1006463D
ISBN: 0792861914
UPC: 027616906540
EAN: 9780792861911
Theatrical Release Date: 2003
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Regional princes and the powerful church wield a fast firm & merciless grip in 16th century germany. When martin luther issues a challenge to their authority the people declare him their new leader - and hero. Even when threatened with a violent death luther refuses to back down sparking a bloody revolution. Studio: Tcfhe/mgm Release Date: 03/06/2007 Starring: Joseph Fiennes Peter Ustinov Run time: 113 minutes Rating: Pg13 Director: Eric Till
Amazon.com
Like The Passion of the Christ, Luther is the story of a spiritual leader, German monk Martin Luther (Joseph Fiennes), in opposition to the religious orthodoxy of the time (in his case, the 1500s). His goal--to bring God to the people and to take money, fear, and shame out of the equation--made him a reformer to some, a heretic to others. Released around the same time as Mel Gibson's blockbuster, it failed to attract the same degree of attention--or controversy. Granted, it's a different film, but not radically so. Directed by Eric Till (Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace), Luther isn't always easy to follow or as emotionally involving as it could be. That said, it's a fascinating story and Fiennes receives solid support from Alfred Molina (Frida), Bruno Ganz (Wings of Desire), and the late Sir Peter Ustinov (Spartacus), in his final film role, as Frederick the Wise. --Kathleen C. Fennessy
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 211 more reviews...
 Incredible January 6, 2009
I avoided this movie when it was in the theaters. Finally a friend rented it and I reluctantly watched it. I was so moved and captivated by it I bought it!
Excellent! December 29, 2008
This is an excellent film about the beginnings of Protestantism. It is well acted and respectful of the history involved. It does not sugar coat Luther or the factions involved with his movement. Some might view it as anti-Catholic, but the actions of the Catholic Church at the time merely reflect the way things were at the time. This is a great historical drama and should be of interest to those who are not particularly religious. From what I can gather, its is quite accurate historically. As a footnote, this is the last major motion picture to feature Sir Peter Ustinov. As always, he gives a gem of a performance. Highly recommended.
Excellent movie December 20, 2008
This movie is awesome. I really learned a lot about what happened in the 16th century Protestant Reformation. Though it's likely not the most accurate movie, but that is to be expected with any movie.
 Admire Luther but admire truth more December 15, 2008
Of course, one would expect a biographical sketch to be favorable to its object. And so it is that this one is favorable to Dr. Martin Luther. However, at times it is so slanted as to be historically inaccurate and theologically dishonest. There was much praiseworthy in Dr. Luther insofar as he sought truth. Would that more of his biographers would seeking truth as seriously.
For instance, this film implies very strongly (as have many Protestants) that Luther's German translation of the New Testament was the first of its kind. It was not. There were previous and better German translations before Luther. And the primary reason the Church opposed Luther's translation was not because it was a German translation - but because it was a very poor translation slanted to justify his own theological presuppositions. As an example, Luther insisted on adding the word "alone," as in "faith alone" where it did not appear in any of the manuscripts for Romans 3:28.
Misrepresentation of the Church and her authority in favor of a stubborn and arrogant insistence that personal interpretation is justified by scripture is another slant. We are encouraged to lift our heads high in Luther's response that he will only be "convinced from sacred scripture" yet never reminded that Luther defined "sacred scripture" as only those portions of scripture that supported his theological assertions - putting the cart before the horse as it were. Not only did his followers reject the Deuterocanonical books (see Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger: The Untold Story of the Lost Books of the Protestant Bible) but Luther himself notoriously questioned the canonicity of James (see the RSV translation of James 2:24 for a hint why). His true vision was not "scripture alone" but "Luther alone," leading us to wonder if perhaps the film might be as easily titled, "The Man Who Would be Pope."
Admirers of Luther may enjoy this film but depth of understanding will lead us elsewhere for a better biographical study and a deeper understanding of the
Reformation. Rather than rejoicing at the rupture of the Church and the disintegration of the "one holy catholic and apostolic" body, we should be praying for a return to unity in truth. A more balanced treatment of the Reformation in general and Martin Luther in particular can be found in The Reformation (The Story of Civilization VI).
uninspired December 14, 2008
This film avoids all real controversy. It is more of a hagiography than a drama. Some of the arguments prevented are well acted and the historical mood is reproduced artistically.
|
|
|
|
Powered by CBN AssociateStore
| |
